Your institution measures attainment with rigour. Mizaji brings the same rigour to the wellbeing of everyone inside it, reads the whole picture every term, and delivers the work that follows.
dimensions that predict and define institutional wellbeing
sub-domains measured across the whole institution
routed pathways into targeted programmes
clinicians, psychologists, counsellors and educators
re-reading, so movement is visible not claimed
It is the only one you are asked to run without specialists. You already hold the assets. What is missing is the layer that connects them into a picture, and the capacity to act on what it shows.
We work alongside your existing team, strengthen what already works, and take load off them.
We test whether they hold in practice, and make what you already do measurable.
They become inputs to a fuller picture rather than isolated snapshots nobody reopens.
Most providers hand an institution a measurement and leave the response to it. Others deliver programmes with no reading underneath them. The work only holds when the same hands do both.
One that reads every population together, produces a profile specific to your institution, targets the work at what that profile actually shows, and reads it again next term to see whether it moved.
We do not replace anything you have. We give it a spine.
A closed loop, run on a framework built for international educational institutions rather than adapted from one built for somewhere else. Nothing is improvised, and nothing is left as a recommendation.
Students, teaching and non-teaching staff, families and your systems, assessed together in a single administration.
Our team analyses the pattern across every sub-domain and explains it to your leadership in plain terms, with priorities ordered.
Each finding routes to specific programmes with a defined format and dose, delivered by us on a schedule agreed with you.
The next term the same institution is read again, so you see where the gaps were and where they are shrinking.
Programmes are selected by what the reading shows, never picked from a catalogue. Effort concentrates where the profile is weakest rather than spread evenly for appearances.
Targeted where a year group or cohort shows need. Built on established therapeutic and educational practice.
Formatted around a timetable so provision strengthens the institution rather than interrupting it.
Shaped by what the parent reading identifies, with engagement tracked rather than assumed.
We advise, and where the work is ours to do, we build it with you and rehearse it.
Findings reach us pseudonymised and are reported at group level. Your institution holds the key that connects a code to a person, and it never leaves your side.
Findings, sub-domain detail, the programmes scheduled and the movement across terms, held in one system rather than scattered across documents nobody reopens. One reading tells you where you stand. Several tell you what the institution is becoming.
Every element is there because a head of school, a board or an inspector will eventually ask how it works. These are the answers.
Clinicians, counsellors, educational psychologists, educators and advisors, each brought in where the finding calls for their expertise.
Aligned with whole-school approach principles and the international standards set by WHO and UNESCO, applied as they were intended.
Measurement built on internationally validated tools, selected for educational settings and used as designed.
The system computes. A qualified person reads it, checks it against everything else the institution shows, and signs it.
Pseudonymised throughout, reported at group level, with role-based access. Identities stay with your institution, always.
Designed for international educational institutions abroad, contextually reworked and culturally aligned to the community you actually serve.
It begins with one structured conversation with your leadership team, around forty five minutes, and a short assessment of where the institution stands today. From there we both decide whether it is the right fit.
Around forty five minutes with your leadership team, and a short assessment of where the institution stands. We reply within a few working days.